BETA PROGRAMME
Every correction this engine has had came from a regulatory professional running a case through it and telling us what the answer should have been. Two independent reviews have found real defects. This is an offer to the third.
NOTE —
This is not a marketing programme with a discount attached. The engine has been wrong, in public, more than once — a dressing for full-thickness ulcers came out a class too low, an insulin dosing calculator came out two classes too low because a question was answered by default rather than by the user, and both were found by professionals running their own cases rather than by us.
Of the 22 rules of Annex VIII, 2 still have a branch we have not implemented and 2 cannot be settled by a questionnaire at all. All of them are named on the regulatory framework page. We would rather be told about the next one by someone who spotted it than discover it in a complaint.
NOTE —
Enrol with your name, email and professional role, and accept the commitments. Enrolment is automatic and immediate — there is no application to assess and no waiting list. The entitlement is earned later, when your fifth piece of substantive feedback is received.
Free access for 36 months from the day your fifth piece of feedback arrives, starting when the beta ends and paid plans begin, up to 50 classifications a month. During the beta itself everything is free for everyone, so the programme costs you nothing to join and changes nothing today.
No. Your feedback is identified to us — we know who said what, which is what makes it worth acting on — and it is never published, quoted or attributed anywhere without asking you separately at the time. There is no setting that changes this and no box that opts you in.
An observation about a classification you have actually run, saying what the tool produced, what you think the answer should be, and why. A rating does not count, because it cannot be argued with or acted on. Telling us a question is missing counts, and is often the most useful thing.
No, and we would rather say so plainly. Enrolment is automatic and we vet nobody, so it certifies nothing about you and should not be listed as though it did. What is real is the change history: where a correction came from your feedback, that is recorded, and you decide at the time whether your name appears against it.