MDClassifyStart free classification

BETA PROGRAMME

Tell us where it is wrong, and use it free for three years

Every correction this engine has had came from a regulatory professional running a case through it and telling us what the answer should have been. Two independent reviews have found real defects. This is an offer to the third.

The bargain

What you do

  • Send at least 5 pieces of substantive feedback on classifications you have actually run.
  • Sign them — your name and professional role, so we can weigh what you say against the work you do.
  • Tell us what the answer should have been and why, where you think it is wrong. A rating is not feedback; it cannot be argued with or acted on.

What we do

  • Free access for 36 months from the day your fifth piece of feedback is received, beginning when the beta ends and paid plans start. Up to 50 classifications a month.
  • Your feedback is identified and never published. We will know it is yours; nobody else will, unless you separately tell us otherwise in writing.
  • We answer every piece of feedback, including the ones we disagree with, and say what we did about it.
  • Where a correction comes from your feedback, it is recorded in the engine's change history. Whether your name appears there is your choice, asked at the time rather than assumed now.

NOTE —

Nothing changes today. Access is free for everyone while the beta lasts, so joining costs you nothing and gains you nothing yet — the 36 months begin when the beta ends and paid plans start. If that makes the offer sound less exciting, it is because it is an accurate description of it.

Why we are asking

This is not a marketing programme with a discount attached. The engine has been wrong, in public, more than once — a dressing for full-thickness ulcers came out a class too low, an insulin dosing calculator came out two classes too low because a question was answered by default rather than by the user, and both were found by professionals running their own cases rather than by us.

Of the 22 rules of Annex VIII, 2 still have a branch we have not implemented and 2 cannot be settled by a questionnaire at all. All of them are named on the regulatory framework page. We would rather be told about the next one by someone who spotted it than discover it in a complaint.

The limits, stated plainly

  • Enrolment is automatic and immediate. We do not vet applications, so being enrolled says nothing about you and is not a credential.
  • The entitlement is earned on the fifth piece of feedback, not on enrolling. Until then you have the same free access as everyone else during the beta.
  • The 50 classifications a month are a fair-use limit, not a technical wall — if you need more for real work, ask.
  • The entitlement is personal to you and to the address you enrol with. It does not transfer to an employer, a client or a successor practice.
  • It covers the classification and the report as they exist when the beta ends. It does not cover markets added later, or paid features introduced afterwards — we would rather define it narrowly and keep it than promise broadly and qualify it later.

NOTE —

These are conditions of an offer, not of the service. Your rights under the terms of service and the privacy policy are unaffected by joining or by leaving, and you can stop at any point without losing anything you have already earned.

Join

Common questions

What do I have to do to join the MDClassify beta programme?

Enrol with your name, email and professional role, and accept the commitments. Enrolment is automatic and immediate — there is no application to assess and no waiting list. The entitlement is earned later, when your fifth piece of substantive feedback is received.

What do I get?

Free access for 36 months from the day your fifth piece of feedback arrives, starting when the beta ends and paid plans begin, up to 50 classifications a month. During the beta itself everything is free for everyone, so the programme costs you nothing to join and changes nothing today.

Will my feedback be published?

No. Your feedback is identified to us — we know who said what, which is what makes it worth acting on — and it is never published, quoted or attributed anywhere without asking you separately at the time. There is no setting that changes this and no box that opts you in.

What counts as feedback?

An observation about a classification you have actually run, saying what the tool produced, what you think the answer should be, and why. A rating does not count, because it cannot be argued with or acted on. Telling us a question is missing counts, and is often the most useful thing.

Is being a beta tester a credential?

No, and we would rather say so plainly. Enrolment is automatic and we vet nobody, so it certifies nothing about you and should not be listed as though it did. What is real is the change history: where a correction came from your feedback, that is recorded, and you decide at the time whether your name appears against it.